On the 8th of March, we are presented with a pivotal choice in two critical referendums. The first proposal seeks to fundamentally alter the Constitution’s understanding of the family, shifting from its traditional foundation in marriage to a vague notion of “other durable relationships.” This shift not only undermines the sanctity of marriage-based families but introduces a breadth of legal ambiguities and complexities.

Former Attorney General and Minister for Justice Michael McDowell has highlighted the inherent dangers in this vague terminology. The term “durable relationships” lacks a clear legal definition and is absent from current legislation, potentially opening the door to a plethora of interpretations by the judiciary. This could lead to unforeseen and profound changes in family law, affecting areas such as inheritance, welfare rights, and more.

One particularly concerning possibility is the legal recognition of polygamous relationships under the guise of “family.” This could drastically expand eligibility criteria for family reunification in Irish immigration law, leading to unforeseen and possibly unsustainable social and legal outcomes.

The second proposal seeks to replace the Constitution’s specific acknowledgment of women’s roles within the home with a generic concept of “care,” effectively diminishing the unique and invaluable contributions of women in domestic life. This move to gender-neutral language, while seemingly progressive, actually erases the specific recognition of mothers and their unparalleled role in nurturing and maintaining the familial structure.   Additionally, this second proposal will remove the State’s obligation to protect mothers from being forced by economic necessity to work outside the home.

In light of these considerations, it becomes evident that these two proposals have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for the fabric of Irish society. The redefinition of the family risks diluting the time-honoured values that have long been the cornerstone of our communities, and the removal of specific acknowledgments and protections of women’s roles in the home undermines the dignity and value of their contribution.

Therefore, in defence of the traditional family structure, in recognition of the unique role of women in our homes and society, and to maintain clarity and stability in our legal system, we strongly urge you to vote NO on both proposals. This is not just a vote for the preservation of our cultural heritage, but a stand for the future stability and integrity of our nation.